Left: Star indicates 7.1 earthquake on January 2, 2006, at 22:13:40 Universal Time Coordinated (UTC),
located 60 miles NNE of Ndoi Island, Fiji. Right: Star indicates 7.3 east of South Sandwich Islands
north of Antarctica, at 06:10:49 UTC. Maps courtesy USGS.

Upper right corner of map (yellow) is location of the South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands north of Antarctica.

      Fiji island chain north of Auckland, New Zealand, which is also north of Antarctica.

                              

Edgar Cayce at age 55 in 1932.

I read a book called The Earth's Shifting Axis © 1996 by Mac B. Strain (see amazon.com). Strain gave us a skeleton to work from and Jonathan Eagle, my co-author, developed a computer model to incorporate this theory which was applied for a 1 degree shift down the 122 degree west meridian.

THE IDEA OF CHANGING THE ACTUAL POLE ORIENTATION OF THE EARTH, AS OPPOSED TO THE OFTEN-DRIFTING MAGNETIC POLES, RAISES THE QUESTION: WHAT KIND OF ENERGY OR FORCE WOULD IT TAKE TO LITERALLY AFFECT THE ANGLE, THE DEGREE, ON WHICH THE EARTH IS TILTED?

As you know, the Earth has a tremendous amount of angular momentum that tends to keep it spinning just like it is. What we are proposing is that it is not the entire ball of the Earth that is tipping over. What we're saying is that the densest part of the Earth, which is the iron core has a density about 6.0 or 8.0, somewhere in that range. It has its own inner momentum. In fact, it seems to be de-coupled from all the rest of the Earth. It's thought to be rotating slightly faster than the surrounding mantle and crust.

So, if there are shifts in the interior of the Earth, in the core of the very dense material, there's a good chance this can throw off the equilibrium of the spinning Earth. Then the Earth has to assume a new figure. Or the core has to assume a new figure and that figure is such that the outer crust and mantle will slide right over the inner core. This then is what we think will happen if there is this shift. We're not sure there will be a shift. But that's what we think could happen.

The results of such a sliding of the grapefruit skin over the core, if you will, those results are spoken of in several Cayce readings and this is the end point of our speculations.

IN CAYCE'S READINGS, WHAT DID HE LINK THIS DRAMATIC CHANGE IN THE ANGLE OF THE POLES TO IN TERMS OF OTHER EARTH EVENTS?

It means everything because all the other changes that were predicted in two of the very best of the readings ­ all of those changes must fit with a 1 degree pole shift. Here is a more complete text of Cayce's reading 3976-15, on January 19, 1934:

'The earth will be broken up in the western portion of America. The greater portion of Japan must go into the sea. The upper portion of Europe will be changed as in the twinkling of an eye. Land will appear off the east coast of America. There will be the upheavals in the Arctic and in the Antarctic that will make for the eruption of volcanoes in the Torrid areas, and there will be shifting then of the poles - so that where there has been those of a frigid or the semi-tropical will become the more tropical, and moss and fern will grow. And these will begin in those periods in 1958 to 1998, when these will be proclaimed as the periods when His light will be seen again in the clouds.'

 

Cayce's Predicted Time Line Is Off?

WHEN YOU LOOK AT THOSE WORDS AND YOU KNOW THAT CAYCE IN THESE READINGS THOUGHT THIS POLE SHIFT WOULD HAVE OCCURRED BY 2000 TO 2001, AND THAT WE ARE TALKING ON DECEMBER 13, 2005, NO POLE SHIFT HAS OCCURRED TO DATE. WHAT IN YOUR MIND DOES THIS SAY ABOUT THE CAYCE READINGS, THEIR ACCURACY AND PROJECTING INTO THE FUTURE?

I'm so glad you asked that because it bothered me tremendously. I began to wonder more deeply about the reliability of the Earth change readings. So, what I did was go back to the time in the 1920s mainly when various people around Cayce, experiencing his first medical readings that were so successful, and then getting the other readings on such things as Atlantis and so on. they began to wonder where the information was coming from. They asked many questions about this. This lead to two chapters in our book that deal with the general reliability of the readings, where the information came from, and what caused errors in the readings that were given?

I applied the criterion that I developed from the readings themselves on the validity and credibility of the readings. That includes the fact that the truth of the readings could be wavered. Cayce was a channeler and he could contact millions of subconscious minds. And some that had already passed on. Then there were other sources such as the Akashic Records, archangels, universal consciousness - maybe a dozen sources in all.

Then after he contacted a source, if there was a problem in the environment of the reading ­ that is, if the people who were sitting there listening to him might have strong thoughts about some of the material he was covering. Or if he had a cold or other various problems, the material coming through could be wavered.

So, I looked at the particular reading which dealt with the years 2000 to 2001. I looked very carefully at this and it's in our book. I decided that a particular reading, which was 826-8, (August 11, 1936) on pole shift, had low predictive value. This is looking back after there was no pole shift and somebody could say this was just my way of covering up for a bad prediction, which is also possible. But let me tell you about this particular reading. It was given for a woman who had lived on Atlantis. Remember reincarnation is through all the Cayce readings. A woman who lived on Atlantis. This is what the reading actually said:

Question: 'What great change or the beginning of what change, if any, is to take place in the Earth in the year 2000 to 2001 A. D.?'

Answer: 'When there is a shifting of the poles, or a new cycle begins.'

This fragment was for a 35-year-old male Protestant lawyer. This fellow was all over the lot with his questions. He asked many things that were not according to the initial suggestion for the reading, which was that he wanted to have the Cayce source comment on his mental and spiritual developments and expression in the present life (1936).

It was one of the problems with Cayce that when a person deviated in his questions from those of the initial suggestion given by the conductor of the reading that Cayce would be thrown off and material that came through him was wavered as to the full truth of what was being transmitted to his subconscious mind.

The acid test of pole shift and other Earth change predictions is their scientific credibility. If true, momentous societal and political changes are imminent. The geopolitical map of the world will be redrawn. What Jonathan Eagle and I are exploring is the transition from the end of one Age to the beginning of another."

More Information:

Steven Shaman
Skywatch/The Great Red Comet
P.O. Box 15007

Baton Rouge, La 70895

 ©2005, Skywatch-Keep Looking to the Skies. All Rights Reserved