India Thinkers Net Archives Index | Subscribe | RSS
<< July05, 2004 - [India Thinkers Net]CHRO digest July 5th July06, 2004 - [India Thinkers Net]Mumbai court orders 13 accused in Bakery case to surrender >>

Subject: [India Thinkers Net]The 'tallest leader' is a dwarf: BJP returns to hard-Hindutva - July05, 2004



The Daily Star
July 05, 2004
Editorial

The 'tallest leader' is a dwarf: BJP returns to hard-Hindutva
Praful Bidwai writes from New Delhi

The BJP's June 22-24 national executive meeting
in Mumbai will go down as a story of
incomprehension of and bitterness at its
electoral defeat, washing of dirty linen in
public, organisational disarray, ideological
confusion, and leadership crisis.

The BJP has failed to understand its debacle's
causes and to devise a strategy for revival. It
emerged from the meeting badly mauled, with
divergences between Mr Atal Behari Vajpayee and
Mr L.K. Advani becoming visible.

The BJP is now ripe for a virtual takeover by the
RSS and its hardline associates.

Its "tallest leader", it turns out, is only a
dwarf. Mr Vajpayee's stature has shrunk to a
fraction of its earlier size. Once a master
tactician, he has fallen to the level of the
run-of-the-mill politician, given to thoughtless
statements and less-than-mature retractions.

Mr Vajpayee fired the first salvo on June 13,
when he blamed Mr Narendra Modi for the BJP's
electoral losses and said the issue would be
taken up in the national executive. He was
promptly rebuffed by party president M. Venkaiah
Naidu.

Two days later, four VHP-RSS leaders in their
late 70s and 80s, led by Mr Ashok Singhal,
demanded the resignation of the Vajpayee-Advani
duo and a public admission that the BJP lost
because "they discarded Hindutva-related issues."
They also asked the party to fix a "retirement
age" for leaders.

It's laughable that these geriatrics should
demand a "retirement age". But the cruellest
irony was that their line -- of attributing the
BJP's defeat to its departure from
hardline-Hindutva --was accepted by the party
only days later!

Mr Vajpayee misread the party's mood. He got used
to having his way -- by sulking at criticism, or
by cracking the whip. Last year, he made Mr Naidu
retract the vikas purush-loh purush formulation
inside 24 hours. Earlier, he refused to sack
principal secretary-confidante Brajesh Mishra
despite pressure.

Mr Vajpayee's clout derived primarily from the
Prime Ministership, and secondarily, from NDA
allies. He has lost the first. The allies have
shrunk to under half their size. When Mr Vajpayee
realised he had overplayed his hand, he retreated.

This shows Mr Vajpayee hasn't been serious about
opposing an RSS takeover of the BJP. Or else, he
would have put up a fight, by cultivating support
for himself.

Instead, he staged a cheap stunt in Mumbai -- by
saying that he wouldn't lead the party. A day
later, he said this was "a joke". Ultimately, he
entertained Mr Modi over breakfast!

This is typical of Mr Vajpayee's inconsistent
behaviour -- witness his 2000 statement declaring
himself a swayamsevak, but then "clarifying" that
the term meant being a "servant of the nation",
or his 2002 about-turn in Goa over sacking Mr
Modi.

Mr Vajpayee cannot pretend he's a "moderate". He
is as steeped in Hindutva as any other
swayamsevak. It's just that he favours a less
loud, less "in-your-face", softer approach to the
same goal. Even that's not acceptable to his
party.

In Mumbai, the BJP undertook no serious
introspection. Rather, it looked for scapegoats
and hardened its ideological stance.

It refused to recognise that India's political
coordinates have changed and it's seriously out
of tune. The last election turned on two axes:
livelihood issues, and rejection of
ethnic-religious identity politics. The BJP
trotted out question-begging explanations for its
defeat like "overconfidence", "complacency", and
its "image" as a party given to 5-star indulgence.

But the national executive was held in a 7-Star
hotel where delegates had access to seven
restaurants, a gymnasium and sauna!

The explanation that prevailed in Mumbai was
advanced by margadarshak Advani. The party lost
because it neglected its three-legged
"ideological constituency" of "karyakartas, our
ideological parivar, and our social support-base."

The BJP didn't neglect this triad. It drafted in
Mr Modi and Ms Uma Bharati among its star
campaigners. Mr Vajpayee shared election-rally
platforms with Mr Modi more than once. The RSS
canvassed for the BJP door-to-door.

Mr Advani's "explanation" uses circular reasoning
based on dogma: we lost because we didn't win,
and we didn't win because we redefined ourselves,
to become what we aren't. So return to hardline
Hindutva and the allies will come rushing back.
New ones will join in: Ajit Singh, Karunanidhi,
Paswan...

The BJP is day-dreaming. It cannot possibly
retain its allies or recruit new ones by
returning to its "ideological constituency".
Hard-Hindutva will scare them away.

The BJP's past strategy of capitalising on public
disenchantment with the Congress cannot work
today. The public is willing to give the Congress
another chance because it's offering a
compassionate government pledged to correcting
gross disparities and fighting communal bigotry
and fundamentalism. By building regional
alliances, the Congress has re-inserted itself
into the space BJP occupied.

As the BJP moves towards strident communalism,
its first-generation top leadership is no longer
in full command (although Mr Advani has improved
his position). The power-struggle among its
second-rung leaders is unresolved. They are too
many: Messrs Naidu, Mahajan, Jaitley, and Ms
Bharati and Sushma Swaraj.

Clarity will emerge only after the Maharashtra
Assembly elections, due in September. The
BJP-Shiv Sena calculates that the Ishrat
"encounter" killing will polarise opinion and
help communalists. This may be wishful thinking.
Most people are repulsed by the "encounter". The
Congress-NCP will do well by roping in the BSP,
which commands five percent of the vote.

Nationally, the BJP has lost its advantage. If it
clings to hard-Hindutva, it will decline further.
The UPA is making some excellent moves. The
Common Minimum Programme and the National
Advisory Committee are good examples.

The Committee has some outstanding members like
Aruna Roy, Jean Dreze, Madhav Chavan, and N.C.
Saxena. They could provide sound policy and help
keep the government on course. If Mr Manmohan
Singh's team handles the budget well, popular
support for the UPA will surge. The BJP, then,
could be consigned to the margins for a long time.


Praful Bidwai is an eminent Indian columnist.

______

Courtesy-Harsh Kapoor/SACW
www.sacw.net






<< July05, 2004 - [India Thinkers Net]CHRO digest July 5th July06, 2004 - [India Thinkers Net]Mumbai court orders 13 accused in Bakery case to surrender >>
India Thinkers Net Archives Index | Subscribe | RSS
Google
 
Web http://archives.zinester.com
Archives powered by Zinester's Mailing List Service
Details on India Thinkers Net
Browse for more newsletters at Zinester's Ezine Directory
Managed by Zinester's Mailing List Management