India Thinkers Net Archives Index | Subscribe | RSS
<< January24, 2005 - [India Thinkers Net] News updates from CHRO February07, 2005 - [India Thinkers Net]The unbearable lightness of seeing -- P Sainath >>

Subject: [India Thinkers Net]The 10 Worst Corporations of 2004 - January26, 2005



From: Regi P George <george_regi@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:41am
Subject: The 10 Worst Corporations of 2004  

The 10 Worst Corporations of 2004
By Russell Mokhiber
and Robert Weissman
<http://lists.essential.org/pipermail/corp-focus/2005/000193.html>;


When the Multinational Monitor judges gather to pick
the 10 worst corporations of the year, one of their
instructions is: name no companies that appeared on the
previous year's list (barring extraordinary
circumstances).

For the 2004 list, that means no Bayer (even though in
2004 the company pushed for import of genetically
modified rice into the European Union, polluted water
in a South African town with the carcinogen hexavalent
chromium, and was hit with evidence that its pain
medication Aleve (naproxen) increases the risk of heart
attack, among other egregious acts), no Boeing
(despite new evidence that the tanker plane scandal
costing U.S. taxpayers tens of billions of dollars is
even worse than it appeared), no Clear Channel (even
though the radio behemoth in 2004 stooped to new lows
with a "Breast Christmas Ever" contest that promised to
pay for breast implants for a dozen contest "winners"),
and no Halliburton (embroiled in a whole new set of
contracting fraud and bribery charges in 2004).

But at least the no-repeat rule helps limit the field a
bit.

And there remained plenty of worthy candidates.

Of the remaining pool of price gougers, polluters,
union-busters, dictator-coddlers, fraudsters,
poisoners, deceivers and general miscreants, we chose
the following -- presented in alphabetical order -- as
the 10 Worst Corporations of 2004 [full text available
at www.multinationalmonitor.org]:

Abbott Laboratories: Abbott makes the list for raising
the price of Norvir, an important AIDS drug, developed
with a major infusion of U.S. government funds, by 400
percent. The price increase doesn't apply if Norvir is
purchased in conjunction with another Abbott drug,
giving Abbott an unfair advantage over competitors and
tilting consumers to use the Abbott products on the
basis of price.

AIG: The world's largest insurer, American
International Group Inc. (AIG) was charged in October
with aiding and abetting PNC Financial Services in a
fraudulent transaction to transfer $750 million in
mostly troubled loans and venture capital investments
from subsidiaries off of its books. AIG agreed to pay
$126 million to resolve the charges, but it got off
light, entering into a "deferred prosecution agreement"
-- meaning the charges against the company will be
dropped in 12 months time if it abides by the terms of
the agreement.

Coca-Cola: Workers at the Coke bottling plant in
Colombia have been terrorized for years by right-wing
paramilitary forces. A fact-finding mission headed by a
New York City Council member found, among other abuses,
"there have been a total of 179 major human rights
violations of Coca-Cola's workers, including nine
murders. Family members of union activists have been
abducted and tortured." Coke says it opposes the
anti-union violence and in any case that it hasn't had
control of the bottling plant (though it does now,
after purchasing the Colombian bottling company).
Coke's former general counsel, and the former assistant
U.S. attorney general, Deval Patrick, resigned in 2004,
reportedly in part because Coke refused to support an
independent investigation into the Colombia
allegations.

Dow Chemical: The world's largest plastic maker, Dow
purchased Union Carbide in 1999. At midnight on
December 2, 1984, 27 tons of lethal gases leaked from
Union Carbide's pesticide factory in Bhopal, India,
immediately killing an estimated 8,000 people and
poisoning thousands of others. Today in Bhopal, at
least 150,000 people, including children born to
parents who survived the disaster, are suffering from
exposure-related health effects such as cancer,
neurological damage, chaotic menstrual cycles and
mental illness. Dow refuses to take any responsibility.
In a statement, the company says, "Although Dow never
owned nor operated the plant, we -- along with the rest
of industry -- have learned from this tragic event, and
we have tried to do all we can to assure that similar
incidents never happen again."

GlaxoSmithKline: Following revelations and regulatory
action in the UK in 2003 and 2004, the story of the
severe side effects from Glaxo's Paxil (as well as
other drugs in the same family) -- notably that they
are addictive and lead to increased suicidality in
youth -- finally broke in the United States in 2004. In
June, New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer filed
suit against Glaxo, charging the giant drug maker with
suppressing evidence of Paxil's harm to children, and
misleading physicians. Glaxo denied the charges, but
agreed to a new system whereby it would make public
results all of its clinical trials. In October, the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration ordered Glaxo and
makers of drugs in Paxil's class to include a "black
box" warning -- the agency's strongest -- with their
pills.

Hardee's: The fast-food maker is bragging about how
unhealthy is its latest culinary invention, the Monster
Thickburger: "First there were burgers. Then there were
Thickburgers. Now Hardee's is introducing the mother of
all burgers -- the Monster Thickburger. Weighing in at
two-thirds of a pound, this 100 percent Angus beef
burger is a monument to decadence." The Monster
Thickburger is a 1,420-calorie sandwich. Eating one
Thickburger is like eating two Big Macs or five
McDonald's hamburgers. Add 600 calories worth of
Hardee's fries and you get more than the 2,000 calories
that many people should eat in a whole day, according
to Michael Jacobson of the Center for Science in the
Public Interest, which calls the Thickburger "food
porn."

Merck: Dr. David Graham, a Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) drug safety official, calls it "maybe the single
greatest drug-safety catastrophe in the history of this
country." Testifying before a Senate committee in
November, Dr. David Graham put the number in the United
States who had suffered heart attacks or stroke as
result of taking the arthritis drug Vioxx in the range
of 88,000 to 139,000. As many as 40 percent of these
people, or about 35,000-55,000, died as a result,
Graham said. The unacceptable cardiovascular risks of
Vioxx were evident as early as 2000 -- a full four
years before the drug was finally withdrawn from the
market by its manufacturer, Merck, according to a study
released by The Lancet, the British medical journal.
Merck says it disclosed all relevant evidence on Vioxx
safety as soon as it acquired it, and pulled the drug
as soon as it saw conclusive evidence of the drug's
dangers.

McWane: McWane Inc. is a large, privately held
Alabama-based sewer and water pipe manufacturer. In a
devastating series, the New York Times revealed the
company's egregious safety record, and the utter
failure of regulatory agencies to control the company's
workplace violence. Nine McWane employees have lost
their lives in workplace accidents since 1995 -- and
three of the deaths were the result of deliberate
company violations of safety standards. More than 4,600
injuries were recorded among the company's 5,000
employees. According to the Times, McWane pulled the
wool over the eyes of investigators by stalling them at
the factory gates, and then hiding defective equipment.
Accident sites were altered before investigators could
inspect them, in violation of federal rules. When
government enforcement officials did find serious
violations, the Times reported, "the punishment meted
out by the federal government was so minimal that
McWane could treat it as simply a cost of doing
business."

Riggs Bank: An explosive report from the U.S. Senate
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the
Committee on Governmental Affairs, issued in July,
revealed that the Washington, D.C.-based Riggs Bank
illegally operated bank accounts for former Chilean
dictator Augusto Pinochet, and routinely ignored
evidence of corrupt practices in managing more than 60
accounts for the government of Equatorial Guinea.
Although these and other activities seem to violate
U.S. banking rules, the Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency (OCC) did not take enforcement action
against the bank after it learned of these matters in
2002. That presumably was not unrelated to the fact
that the OCC examiner at Riggs soon thereafter went to
work for Riggs. In May 2004, the bank paid $25 million
in fines in connection with money-laundering violations
related to the Equatorial Guinea and Saudi Arabian
governments, and it is the subject of ongoing federal
criminal investigations.

Wal-Mart: While Wal-Mart is presently on a bit of a
public relations defensive, the company remains the
colossus of U.S. -- and increasingly global --
retailing. It registers more than a quarter trillion
dollars in sales. Its revenues account for 2 percent of
U.S. Gross Domestic Product. For two years running,
Fortune has named Wal-Mart the most admired company in
America. It is arguably the defining company of the
present era. A key component -- arguably the key
component -- of the company's business model is
undercompensating employees and externalizing costs on
to society. A February 2004 report issued by
Representative George Miller, D-California, tabulated
some of those costs. The report estimated that one
200-person Wal-Mart store may result in a cost to
federal taxpayers of $420,750 per year -- about $2,103
per employee. These public costs include free and
reduced lunches for just 50 qualifying Wal-Mart
families, Section 8 housing assistance, federal tax
credits and deductions for low-income families, and
federal contributions to health insurance programs for
low-income children.

Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington,
D.C.-based Corporate Crime Reporter,
<http://www.corporatecrimereporter.com>. Robert
Weissman is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based
Multinational Monitor,
<http://www.multinationalmonitor.org>, and counsel for
Essential Inventions, a nonprofit involved in the
pricing dispute discussed in the Abbott profile.
Mokhiber and Weissman are co-authors of On the Rampage:
Corporate Predators and the Destruction of Democracy
(Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press).

(c) Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman


 









<< January24, 2005 - [India Thinkers Net] News updates from CHRO February07, 2005 - [India Thinkers Net]The unbearable lightness of seeing -- P Sainath >>
India Thinkers Net Archives Index | Subscribe | RSS
Google
 
Web http://archives.zinester.com
Archives powered by Zinester's Mailing List Service
Details on India Thinkers Net
Browse for more newsletters at Zinester's Ezine Directory
Managed by Zinester's Mailing List Management