|
India Thinkers Net Archives Index
|
Subscribe
|
|
| << April27, 2005 - [India Thinkers Net] CHRO updates 27th April (part1) |
April28, 2005 - [India Thinkers Net] Capital punishment news from CHRO >> |
|
[8] Rediff.com/PTI, April 27, 2005, Wednesday SC reserves verdict on anthem, Jethmalani bats for 'Sindh' Noted lawyer Ram Jethmalani on Wednesday made an impassioned plea before the Supreme Court against deleting 'Sindh' from the national anthem. Appearing for the All India Sindhi Council before a Bench of Chief Justice R C Lahoti and Justice P K Balasubramanyan, Jethmalani, a Sindhi himself, gave vent to the hurt feelings of millions of Sindhis across the world. He listened patiently when petitioner Sanjeev Bhatnagar argued for the deletion of the word 'Sindh' from the anthem saying it is the name of a province in Pakistan. Bhatnagar said the over 100 crore population of India would be happy if 'Sindh' was substituted with 'Kashmir'. Attorney General Milon Banerjee said the Constituent Assembly in 1950 had adopted the national anthem when Sindh was already a part of Pakistan but Tagore himself had clarified that the poem had no reference to any particular geographical area but the cultures in India. He said "any tampering with the poetic language or the text would stir a hornet's nest encouraging demands for inclusion or deletion of words in the national anthem." http://in.rediff.com/news/2005/apr/27anthem.htm ----------------------------------------------------------------------- [9] The Tribune, April 26, 2005, Tuesday Undertrial says he was branded by officials Tribune News Service Ludhiana, April 25: An accused in the Lalla murder case, Mohan Lal, who appeared in a local court today, claimed that he was branded by Jalandhar jail officials yesterday. While the Jail Superintendent denied the allegation, Mohan Lal alleged that the words ???neevi jaat??? (low caste) was etched on his back with hot iron rods. http://www.tribuneindia.com/2005/20050426/punjab1.htm ----------------------------------------------------------------------- [10] From: Regi P George <george_regi@yahoo.com Date: Wed Apr 27, 2005 Subject: Athirappilly Hydro Electric Project Subject: People's Public Hearing- Athirappilly Hydro Electric Project People Again Unite to Reject the Athirappilly Hydro Electric Project On May 7th at Chalakudy, Kerala, India The 163 MW Athirappilly Hydro Electric Project proposed on the Chalakudy River, Thrissur, has again raised its ugly head with fresh environmental clearance from the Ministry of Environment and Forests. As you are aware, the controversial project was once categorically rejected by the river dependent community and people who love the River from all walks of life at a Public Hearing held on 6th February 2002 at Thrissur. The Hon. High Court of Kerala had thoroughly criticized the slipshod Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) conducted by Tropical Botanical Garden and Research Institute (TBGRI), Thiruvanathapuram, without even a Public Hearing on the basis of which sanction had been accorded to the project 7 years back. The tremendous response of the people against the project at the Public Hearing held later on Court Orders on 6th Feb 2002 was proof enough that people had absolutely no need of the Project. The Public Hearing Panel communicated the strong dissent of the people to the MoEF. Athirappilly HEP was as good as shelved. After a long period of silence (and subversive operations) from the part of the Kerala State Electricity Board, February 18th 2005 brought the news that Athirappilly HEP has obtained fresh clearance from the Ministry of Environment and Forests on the basis of a ??? brand new??? EIA conducted by a Delhi based agency- WAPCOS- again without a Public Hearing!! Not only that but the EIA report of WAPCOS contains outrageous factual errors and fallacies regarding the agricultural area of the affected Panchayaths, the tribal settlements to be displaced by the project, electricity generation details etc. At many a place the WAPCOS study is a blind replica of the TBGRI study! To protest against this gross violation of the self-governing rights of the people of the affected panchayaths and the total disregard for the rules and regulations for the conduct of a proper comprehensive EIA, we are organizing a People??™s Public Hearing at Chalakudy on the 7th of May 2005. Please be a part of the meeting and express solidarity with the people and the River! For further details do mail back to us. Latha/Unnikrishnan/Ravi/Madhusoodhanan/Amitabachan/Sreeja/ Indu/Murari/Vanchi Contact numbers: 0487-5524110 0487-2353021 09447527345 Chalakudy Puzha Samrakshana Samithi Karthika, Manalattil Ollur. P. O Thrissur 680306 Kerala, India Ph: +91-487-2353021 chalakudyriver@... ------------------------------------------------- [11] Water torture, Chinese style Water torture, Chinese style There??™s a new receptivity to coercive measures of population control in India today PAMELA PHILIPOSE Amidst the quixotic moral crusades the Maharashtra government has been waging against bar girls, another odious measure it had tried to push through went largely uncommented. Some days ago, the Vilasrao Deshmukh government introduced the Maharashtra Water Resources Regulatory Authority Bill, which de-barred farmers with more than two children from irrigation benefits. The proposal underwent modification after discussion in the assembly. Under the revised formula, farmers with larger families will have to pay up to one and a half times more than the going rate for irrigation water. The state??™s irrigation minister, Ajit Pawar, justified the government??™s move on two grounds. One, that it will help conserve water in a chronically water deficient state ??” as Pawar put it, ???Over the decades, the capacity of our water resources has remained the same, even though the use of water has increased manifold. We need a stringent measure to check (this).??? Two, it is a useful population control measure ??”says Pawar,???The two child norm has been been made mandatory in all local self government bodies and there is nothing wrong if the same yardstick was applied in water distribution.??? Both arguments betray the self-serving mindset of the state??™s ruling coalition. Take the first argument. Why, for instance, does Ajit Pawar not target big sugar cane farmers for causing widespread aridity in the state, since cane requires over four times as much water as most other crops? If he is so concerned about conserving water, why doesn??™t he get these political fat cats to switch to more eco-sensitive produce? Surely he knows that sugar cane consumes more than 70 per cent of the state??™s water resources earmarked for agriculture? Shouldn??™t this prompt a serious rethink on cropping patterns? But Ajit Pawar will not ???de-bar??? sugar cane farmers from consuming excessive water, because he knows that his government??™s power flows from those lakhs of hectares of sugar cane that dovetail neatly into the large sugar cooperatives behind which sit the most prominent politicians in his state. He opts, instead, for the politically expedient measure of zeroing in on farmers with large families. These are the very families who have not made the demographic transition to smaller units, largely because of illiteracy, poverty, caste barriers and political disempowerment. They are the ones which are, more likely than not, trying to support themselves on small holdings. They are also, more likely than not, critically dependent on an indifferent monsoon for survival. By attempting to deny this vulnerable group access to something as basic as irrigation benefits, or at least to control such access, these leaders are reneging on their constitutional duty to ensure justice, equality and dignity for all. Their deliberate espousal of a silver bullet solution indicates that they do not have the time, energy or inclination to address issues like health, child mortality, education and employment ??” which would translate into smaller families and declining numbers. The point made by a great number of demographers, social scientists, economists ??” Amartya Sen most famously ??” is that coercive methods of controlling the population do not translate into controlling numbers in a sustainable manner. This approach has, besides, serious demographic consequences such as skewed sex ratios. Maharashtra is one of the states that have registered fairly rapid declines in its sex ratio and politicians like Ajit Pawar will only ensure that the trend becomes more pronounced as the years pass. The consequences of the Chinese model of authoritarian population control is already patent. It is based on four basic approaches: the setting of targets and quotas; bribes and punishments; organisational control; and promotional propaganda. It is a model that can be extremely effective, China demographer John Aird points out, in a ???politically inert, uneducated, impoverished population??? with ???an established pattern of bureaucratic authoritarianism???. The stories of ???over-quota??? mothers being forcibly subjected to late abortions, of women locked up until they agree to a sterilisation, of workers keeping a tab on the menstrual cycles of female colleagues, are a legion from the land of the Middle Kingdom. There is a new receptivity to such measures in India today. Several states have already gone far beyond just denying access to elected offices to those with more than two children. Couples are being denied ration cards and credit; the benefits of government housing schemes and subsidies, if they have larger families. The question we need to ask ourselves is whether we, in a democratic polity, wish to subject people to such undemocratic control? Especially when we have not yet ensured that the basic needs of a large number are met ??” China, at least, to give credit where it is due, has been far more successful in doing this. This way, we could end up punishing once again precisely those people who have already been punished several times by indifferent, corrupt, and ineffectual governance and a pernicious caste system. |
|
| << April27, 2005 - [India Thinkers Net] CHRO updates 27th April (part1) |
April28, 2005 - [India Thinkers Net] Capital punishment news from CHRO >> |
|
India Thinkers Net Archives Index
|
Subscribe
|
|
|
Archives powered by Zinester's Mailing List Service
Details on India Thinkers Net |
Browse for more newsletters at Zinester's Ezine Directory
Managed by Zinester's Mailing List Management |