|
India Thinkers Net Archives Index
|
Subscribe
|
|
| << September29, 2005 - [India Thinkers Net]Global warming,Persian puzzle,Countercrruents etc |
October01, 2005 - [India Thinkers Net]Cynical war,Pak news,Kashmir & Mahatir.... >> |
|
[1] From: "sanjeev nayyar" <exploreindia@vsnl.net> Date: Thu Sep 29, 2005 Subject: Re: [indiathinkersnet] LNG deal is off: Iran We should be grateful to Iran if indeed they have called off the deal, the biggest consumers of this Gas are SEB's who are broke and Fertiliser cos who receive subsidy from the govt, so cancellation of this deal will result in reducing the subsidy burden for india besides paying the jehadi pakistan a 600million $ annual fee. with prem sanjeev http://www.hindu.com/2005/09/28/stories/2005092813940100.htm ----------------------------- [2] From: Regi P George <george_regi@yahoo.com> Date: Thu Sep 29, 2005 Subject: Congress transferred its votes to BJP CPI(M): Congress transferred its votes to BJP Staff Reporter `Tacit ties with BJP led to Congress defeat' PALAKKAD: Communist Party of India (Marxist) leaders here have said that the `tacit understanding' the Congress had made with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in the local body election has led to the defeat of the grand old party in Palakkad municipality. Addressing a press conference here on Tuesday, CPI(M) district secretary P. Unni; N.N. Krishnadas, MP; and M. Narayanan, former MLA, pointed out that the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) which had only 21 seats in the 50-member municipal council had been in power in the urban body during the last five years with the support of the BJP. In the present election, the UDF entered into an ``unholy electoral understanding'' with the BJP, which was determined to stop the CPI(M)-led Left Democratic Front (LDF) from coming to power here at any cost. The CPI(M) leaders presented a list of wards where the Congress supported the BJP and vice versa, at the press conference. They pointed out that in Wards 4, 11, 14, 32, 40, 41, 44 and 47 the Congress got only 93, 156, 89, 157, 140, 74, 104 and 77 votes respectively. The Congress had led in all these wards in the last Lok Sabha and Assembly elections. In all these wards the Congress votes have gone to the BJP. The BJP has not put up candidates in 10 wards and its votes have gone to the Congress in these places. (The BJP is the single largest party in the new council.) The CPI(M) leaders said their party would not support the Congress or the BJP in the council. Meanwhile, the Left Democratic Front (LDF) has retained Perumatty and Pudussery grama panchayats in Palakkad districts where soft drink majors Coca-Cola and Pepsi Cola are facing popular agitation against their bottling plants. The last grama panchayats' actions against Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Limited at Plachimada (Perumatty) and the Pepsi Cola bottling unit at Kanjikode (Pudussery) had attracted international attention. An agitation has been going on in front of the Coca-Cola plant for the last three years demanding its closure for `exploiting' groundwater resources in the area. In Ward 7 (where the Coke plant is situated), panchayat president A. Krishnan of the Janata Dal (Secular), a constituent of the Left Democratic Front (LDF), won with a margin of 236 votes. The LDF won 12 seats and the UDF two in the panchayat. In the 22-member Pudussery panachayat, the Communist Party of India (Marxist)-led LDF won 16 seats. The Democratic Indira Congress (Karunakaran), backed by the LDF, won one seat. The LDF has wrested Malampuzha and Nelliyampathy grama panchayats, two popular tourism centres in the State, from the Congress in the just-concluded local bodies elections. UDF withstands LDF wave in Malappuram Staff Reporter LDF improves its position in district MALAPPURAM: Malappuram withstood the electoral wave unleashed by the Left Democratic Front (LDF) across the State. The United Democratic Front (UDF) did not buckle in the district as it did elsewhere, thanks mainly to the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML). However, a close look at the results of the local body elections show that the UDF bastion has shaken, though not violently. The LDF has made apparent gains in Malappuram district, though it suffered badly in the municipalities of Manjeri and Malappuram. The LDF won seven seats in Malappuram district panchayat. It seized power in three of the 14 block panchayats, and 30 of the 102 grama panchayats. In the outgoing district panchayat council, the LDF had only four seats. In the 32-seat new council, the IUML will have 20 members and the Congress 5. The LDF wrested the block panchayats of Ponnani and Tirur and retained power in Perumbadappu, which was the lone block panchayat ruled by the LDF in Malappuram -------------------------- [3] From: yogi sikand <ysikand@yahoo.com> Date: Thu Sep 29, 2005 Subject: J&K State Human Rights Commission: Human Rights Features HUMAN RIGHTS FEATURES (Voice of the Asia-Pacific Human Rights Network) (A joint initiative of SAHRDC and HRDC) B-6/6 Safdarjung Enclave Extension, New Delhi 110 029, India. Phone/Fax: +91-11-2619 2717 / 2619 2706 / 2619 1120 E-mail: hrf@... Home Page: http://www.hrdc.net/sahrdc/ HRF/127/05 Embargoed for 28 September 2005 J&K State Human Rights Commission The healing can begin here Toothless tiger. Now, a dead horse. If the Jammu and Kashmir state government wishes to make good its Common Minimum promise to strengthen the Jammu and Kashmir State Human Rights Commission (SHRC), it is going to have take note of these sombre ??“ but apt ??“ metaphors. Last week, SHRC chairperson Justice A.M. Mir was quoted as saying that insofar as the implementation of the SHRC??™s recommendations was concerned, he was effectively ???whipping a dead horse.??? ???One of our earlier chairmen [said] the commission [was] a toothless tiger, and when the government withdrew the inspector general of police rank officer [attached to the SHRC], we did say that we have lost the tail as well. The executing agencies are behind all this,??? Justice Mir charged. If a ???healing touch??? is what the state government intended for the people of Jammu and Kashmir, then empowering the SHRC should have been one of the first steps in this direction. The Common Minimum Programme of the Congress-People??™s Democratic Party government, in fact, lists the strengthening of the SHRC as one of the key objectives. The SHRC has, to the contrary, seen a rapid decline in its credibility, as Justice Mir himself publicly affirmed last week. The United Nations principles governing the establishment and functioning of national human rights institutions (???Paris Principles???) require that the institution be provided with ???an infrastructure which is suited to the smooth conduct of its activities, in particular adequate funding. The purpose of this funding should be to enable it to have its own staff and premises, in order to be independent of the Government and not be subject to financial control which might affect its independence.??? The infrastructure and resources provided to the J&K SHRC, however, are in no way ???suited to the smooth conduct of its activities???. Take building and infrastructure. In a situation where the SHRC has to handle an increasing number of complaints, it is still grappling with problems such as operating out of a half-completed office building that has already fallen into disrepair. As stated in the SHRC??™s 2003-2004 annual report, a portion of the SHRC??™s intended headquarters in Srinagar was completed in 2001. Since that time, work on the building has slowed almost to a halt; the SHRC has been stranded in expensive rented premises ??“ of Rs. 46,500 a month ??“ that is not even sufficient for the commission??™s purposes nor commensurate with its status. This is only marginally better than the situation in Jammu, where the SHRC??™s ???sub-office??™ has no office space to speak of. This is especially problematic given the increase of reported cases originating in the Jammu area. In order to tackle the caseload, in January-February 2004, the SHRC chairperson attempted to open an additional office of the SHRC in Jammu but was forced to operate from his residence, as no office was provided for him. The SHRC??™s struggle for adequate facilities and resources is not a recent development. In its 1998-1999 report, it had complained of similar problems. Unfortunately, little seems to have changed. Over the past six years, in successive annual reports, the SHRC has consistently noted its difficulties in investigating reports in remote areas, such as Doda and parts of Rajouri, due to the simple fact that it does not have a vehicle capable of traversing rough terrain. Nor is it equipped with a video camera. Members of the SHRC are forced to perform onsite investigations themselves and generate descriptions of the situations. This process is both inefficient and inadequate; in that any written description will fail to capture the detailed visual information a camera is capable of recording. Apart from the lack of physical resources, the SHRC is beset by a number of problems related to its powers and its autonomy, which have had a major impact on its functioning and credibility. First, the SHRC is dependent on the State government for funding, and must approach the government every time it requires an appropriation. This is unacceptable. The SHRC must not be reduced to a dependent extension of the state government. Moreover, the current procedure is administratively inefficient, with the SHRC having to formally apply to the state government??™s Finance department for funding each of its requirements. The SHRC should be spending its time independently investigating abuses, not filling out paperwork requesting furniture, office supplies and other essential facilities. The Paris Principles state that the funding of a human rights institution should be assured and adequate. The SHRC??™s resources, however, have not increased in conjunction with the needs of the people of Jammu and Kashmir. In 2002, the Amendment to the Jammu and Kashmir Protection of Human Rights Act (PHRA) stripped the SHRC of its ability to appoint its technical staff and transferred this power to the government. This is a serious problem. The SHRC cannot now appoint its own staff, and the government has failed to do so. According to the SHRC??™s 2003-2004 report, eight essential posts had remained vacant for the three previous years. If this undue delay is the result of negligence, such gross oversight is astounding. If, on the other hand, the lack of appointments is the result of a deliberate attempt to impair the SHRC, the problem is far more serious. The government, in fact, transfers and replaces SHRC staff at will, without consulting the chairperson, as demonstrated by the withdrawal of the aforementioned IGP-rank officer more than three years ago, in May 2002. For an institution that is often required to carry out independent investigations in order to verify and/or address complaints of human rights violation, the presence of investigating officers is essential. This is also stipulated in Section 11(1) of the Jammu and Kashmir PHRA. During a recent field trip, the South Asia Human Rights Documentation Centre brought this matter to the attention of a senior state government official, who said an appointment would be made soon. It has been two months since that assurance, and no such appointment is reported to have been made. The SHRC, as a result, has been submitting complaints about police abuses to the investigative discretion of the police, which is akin to allowing an individual to be the judge of his/her own case, thereby violating a cardinal principle of natural justice. This method, in fact, was being resorted to even when the SHRC had an investigating officer, as clearly, the sole investigator could not possibly conduct all the necessary probes himself. Last, and perhaps, most significant, is the marked disregard shown by senior civil servants, particularly Deputy Commissioners, to the SHRC??™s recommendations. They have been known to initiate their own independent investigations, the conclusions of which often contradict the SHRC??™s findings, thereby serving to weaken the authority of the SHRC and undermine its role. A report obtained from the SHRC details 23 recent decisions in which the concerned Deputy Commissioner did not implement the SHRC??™s recommendations. As Justice Mir complained, ???it is an anomaly that for executing warrants against the police officials, we are dependent on the same force.??? Without an effective enforcement mechanism, the SHRC??™s recommendations are meaningless. The former chairperson, Justice Abdul Qadir Parray, had made a similar complaint in 2002, stating that ???cases of human rights violations in Kashmir at the hands of security forces are gathering dust in the official chambers of L.K. Advani. Our commission is only a recommendatory body and has not been provided with enough powers to force implementation.??? In a similar vein, the SHRC has also repeatedly called for the government to provide an Action Taken Report (ATR) on its recommendations. For several years, this call has not been heeded. This year, the government is known to have delivered an ATR to the Assembly. The ATR reportedly details the action taken by the government in 141 cases in the 2003-2004 report, in which the SHRC made recommendations. The SHRC report however had listed 152 cases in which compensation had been ordered ??“ eleven more than the number mentioned in the ATR. The Ministry of Home Affairs reportedly asserted that for those 11 cases, no recommendations had been made, although this conclusion is at odds with the SHRC report. More disturbingly, according to at least one source, in 108 of the cases in which the government took ???action,??? the government did not, in fact, provide compensation. Another problem with the SHRC is its inability to pursue cases in concert with other legal authorities. It is the policy of the SHRC to dismiss cases for want of jurisdiction when cases are pending adjudication in courts of law. The SHRC is empowered to intervene in any proceeding involving any allegation of violation of human rights pending before a court with the approval of the court. It should strive to carry out this function, as its assistance to the court may prove decisive. Its mere presence in the court will highlight the significance of such cases, ensure the protection of victims or witnesses, and help bring about the successful prosecution of human rights violators. - Human Rights Features |
|
| << September29, 2005 - [India Thinkers Net]Global warming,Persian puzzle,Countercrruents etc |
October01, 2005 - [India Thinkers Net]Cynical war,Pak news,Kashmir & Mahatir.... >> |
|
India Thinkers Net Archives Index
|
Subscribe
|
|
|
Archives powered by Zinester's Mailing List Service
Details on India Thinkers Net |
Browse for more newsletters at Zinester's Ezine Directory
Managed by Zinester's Mailing List Management |