|
India Thinkers Net Archives Index
|
Subscribe
|
|
| << April21, 2006 - [India Thinkers Net] Counter currents,China etc |
April23, 2006 - [India Thinkers Net] Nepal situation,IAS,coke etc >> |
|
[1] From: rkurian@bgl.vsnl.net.in Date: Fri Apr 21, 2006 Subject: Bush's Indian Ally! http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/19/AR2006041902480.\ html?referrer=emailarticle Bush's Indian Ally By Jim Hoagland Thursday, April 20, 2006; A25 NEW DELHI -- At a time when even friendly governments are quick to distance themselves from the United States and its pugnacious, embattled president, India is a strategic maverick. The former firebrand of the Non-Aligned Movement has chosen this moment to forge a close partnership with Washington and to speak up positively about American power in world affairs. "This lack of nuclear cooperation is the last remaining cobweb from our old relationship, and we can now sweep it aside," Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said with an expressive wave of his hand. "There are no other barriers to a more productive, more durable relationship with the United States. The potential is enormous for our two nations." India is the new China in the eyes of the Bush administration, which has promised to help this once-slumbering Asian giant develop into one of the world's five or six major economic and political powers. That undertaking has instilled a new sense of security in the Indian capital and erased long-standing tensions. Singh praised "the new thinking" in Washington during our conversation and easily skipped over renewed U.S. arms sales to Pakistan, American pressure for action on Iran and other topics that would have sunk most of his predecessors into bitter grumbling about neo-imperialism. The Indian leader's impressively modest and precise manner sets a moderate tone for his remarks. A visitor quickly understands why he is trusted and respected by his peers in the rough-and-tumble world of Indian politics. That does not prevent him from being candid in his assessments: "We recognize that the United States is the preeminent superpower in the world and that it is in India's interest to have good relations with the United States . . . as a very important partner in realizing our development ambitions," he acknowledged. One way of helping with development and environmental protection, Singh quickly suggested, was for the U.S. Congress to approve legislative changes that clear the way for the United States to provide civilian nuclear technology and supplies to India after a 32-year ban triggered by India's development and testing of nuclear weapons. Bush and Singh reached agreement last July on reciprocal steps for the resumption of nuclear energy cooperation outside the international Non-Proliferation Treaty. Singh has persuaded his left-wing allies in the coalition government he heads not "to wreck the boat" by opposing "an agreement that is in India's interest" because of their suspicion of Washington. The administration hopes to move the legislative changes through Congress in May, giving Bush a badly needed foreign policy success as well as the first direct American influence over India's nuclear weapons program, which would be partially covered by new safeguards and inspections. Singh would not speculate on the consequences of a refusal by Congress to accept the agreement. But in response to questions, he did identify two things that he does not expect to happen. Asked if India would ever put all of its reactors under full-scope safeguards -- as some U.S. critics say Bush should have demanded -- he replied: "No. We would like the world to move toward universal nuclear disarmament. But given the circumstances, we need a strategic nuclear weapons program. In our neighborhood, China is a nuclear power and on our western frontier there is Pakistan, which developed its weapons through clandestine proliferation." And he said he could not imagine circumstances that would require India to resume nuclear testing, an option that his Indian critics assert is a sovereign right. "Our scientists tell me they need no further tests. As for the distant future, I cannot predict forever, but our commitment is to continue our unilateral moratorium." The conversation underscored for me that flaws in the nuclear draft agreement are heavily outweighed by the advantages it brings in cutting global pollution, easing pressure on oil markets and bringing a substantial part of India's nuclear program under international supervision. Noting that Chinese President Hu Jintao was visiting the United States this week, Singh insisted that "we are not developing our relationship with the U.S. at the cost of our relationship with China, which is our neighbor and with which our trade is growing at a handsome rate. . . . President Bush told me this is a sensible way to proceed, and that America will remain engaged with China, too." On Iran, he urged Washington to allow "the maximum scope for dialogue and discussions. The Iranian regime may need some time to settle down." But, he added, "we are very clear that we do not want another nuclear weapons power in the region." India is moving from a past of shaking an angry finger in the American face to providing a helping hand for U.S. power in the future. The Senate and House should move expeditiously to set this transformation in motion. jimhoagland@washpost.com © 2006 The Washington Post Company --------------------- [2] From: rkurian@bgl.vsnl.net.in Date: Fri Apr 21, 2006 Subject: The Real First Casualty of War...John Pilger The Real First Casualty Of War By John Pilger http://www.countercurrents.org/pilger210406.htm This acute skepticism, this skill of reading between the lines, is urgently needed in supposedly free societies today. Take the reporting of state-sponsored war. The oldest clich? is that truth is the first casualty of war. I disagree. Journalism is the first casualty. Not only that: it has become a weapon of war ---------------------------- [3] From: yogi sikand <ysikand@yahoo.com> Date: Sat Apr 22, 2006 Subject: Book Review: Madrasas in India Book Review Name of Book: Islamic Education, Diversity and National Identity: Dini Madaris in India Post-9/11 Editor: Helmut Reifeld & Jan-Peter Hartung Publisher: Sage Publications, New Delhi Year: 2006 Pp: 331 Price: Rs.650 ISBN: 0-7619-3432-4 Reviewed by: Yoginder Sikand --------------- [4] From: <jitu11in@yahoo.com> Date: Fri Apr 21, 2006 Subject: Re: [indiathinkersnet] sonia gandhi contesting again what about the economical loss country faces. --- nandakumar nair <unnair@yahoo.com> wrote: > SONIA GANDHI CONTESTING AGAIN > > One supposes that ther is no technical or legal bar > on --------------------- [5] From: Sukla Sen <suklasen@yahoo.com> Date: Fri Apr 21, 2006 Subject: Chernobyl and the Colossal Problem of Nuclear Waste http://www.fas.org/main/content.jsp?formAction=297&contentId=543 The Nuclear Dilemma and Lessons from Chernobyl Contact : Anne Fitzpatrick (afitzpatrick@fas.org) Last modified : April 20, 2006 9:12 AM The Nuclear Dilemma and Lessons from Chernobyl By Anne Fitzpatrick afitzpatrick@fas.org |
|
| << April21, 2006 - [India Thinkers Net] Counter currents,China etc |
April23, 2006 - [India Thinkers Net] Nepal situation,IAS,coke etc >> |
|
India Thinkers Net Archives Index
|
Subscribe
|
|
|
Archives powered by Zinester's Mailing List Service
Details on India Thinkers Net |
Browse for more newsletters at Zinester's Ezine Directory
Managed by Zinester's Mailing List Management |