Storytime_Tapestry Archives Index
|
Subscribe
|
|
| << April27, 2007 - Storytime Tapestry Update on Hart |
April28, 2007 - April 28, 2007 - Storytime Tapestry Contributors: Pamela Blaine; Cynthia Groopman >> |
|
Storytime Tapestry Newsletter The newsletter devoted to spreading love and
cultural awareness around the world. Beyond The Mirror – A Bill Allin Column What
Is The Truth? (Part 17) [Caution: What follows may be
offensive to some people because it is based on fact, reason and probability,
not on an established belief set (religion). If you are offended by anything
that does not support your belief set, you should choose to not read this
article.] Where Can
We Go From Here? In this next-to-last part of
the series What Is Truth? we will review the material covered in
previous parts and try to put them in perspective. First of all, all the holy
books that were written for the major religions of today were prepared when
life on earth was very primitive and tribal. The earliest written holy books
were those of the Israelites because it was they who invented our present form
of writing (with letters representing ideas, instead of pictures). The very fact of their being
old does not and should not make them any more sacred than today’s books. In
those days it was very common for people to have dreams and visions which they
believed came from God because they had no other explanation for them. They
believed that every dream or daylight "revelation" relating to their
people was a message from God or one of the deities they worshipped. Even today we have many
people who believe they speak on behalf of God because they have dreamed or
thought something relating to God. That is a primitive and tribal way of
thinking. If you want to see how tribes fare in the modern world, look at the
sectarian violence between the Sunnis and the Shia of Iraq. These each, supposedly,
act on behalf of God. We may have great trouble
imagining what life was like in those days, even if we try to imagine ourselves
trying to scrabble out a living from desert conditions. But those people who
wrote the first holy books (including the much-later Qu’ran) would have no way
to conceive what life would be like today. Even our great grandparents couldn’t
do that. Those people wrote about
rituals, behaviours and rules that would apply to their tribe, to hold it
together against the ravages of other tribes who wanted to destroy them and
take their wealth. Their religion was their culture, something to be
maintained, supported and expanded at all costs. We live in a world that has
(for the most part) passed beyond the tribal stage into megasocieties that have
little in common with life in primitive tribes. We watch National Geographic
specials about tribal peoples and think how unbelievably primitive they are.
The ancient peoples who wrote the holy books were as primitive as the peoples
we see on National Georgraphic specials today. Only the Israelites could commit
stories to paper (papyrus or skins). Everything the people of
those ancient times did not understand, they attributed to magic, miracles or
devils. Their lives were filled with superstition because they had little
knowledge to base their beliefs on. Their life advice (words of wisdom such as
those imparted by Confucius or Plato) works today, but the rest is ancient
history that should remain there. When we adopt ancient tribal ways into modern
culture, we also adopt tribal values which are often brutally violent and
oppressive. When people speak of God, of
what God is and what God does, they have no basis for their statements beyond
what the ancients believed from their superstition. There is no evidence to
support it that passes scrutiny. None of it can be found in the holy books
themselves, other than by distorting messages that were never intended to
convey those interpretations. Radical Muslim clerics teach that the Qu’ran
advocates terrorism, for example, when in fact it does no such thing.
Distorting the words of the holy books to apply to life today is dangerous, as
we can see in People who believe in a
Godless evolution are as closed minded about facts that can prove their beliefs
wrong as those who believe that everything that exists was created from nothing
in six Earth days. If a billion people believe something that is wrong, it’s
still wrong. Just because someone teaches something with conviction and fervor
does not make it truth. Just because they say their words came from God doesn’t
mean that they did. Evolution exists because it
can be shown in action today. If not we would have no reason to fear mutation
of the virus that causes bird flu or similar mutations that could result in
pandemics. Evolution on a micro scale
(such as bird flu virus mutation) is evidence that God does not create
perfection the first time. Rather it proves that God, as Creator, continues to
tinker with His creation. Evolution on a macro scale
(such as results in new species) is a lame belief because science teaches us
that a single entity of a new species could not mate and if it did there would
not be enough variety of DNA to sustain a new species without at least 30
individuals with different DNA to provide genetic diversity. Genetics precludes
macro evolution—that’s science. Without a supernatural power,
new species could never come into being. Non-believing scientists and atheists
may argue against this, but their positions are weak and do not stand up to
scrutiny. The evidence simply doesn’t exist. Science also supports eternal
life, though that life has nothing in common with the heavenly dream worlds
that humans have imagined since the holy books were written. If people believed
in the kind of eternal life proposed by science we would have much less of the
kind of destruction of life and nature our planet experiences at the hands of
those who believe in a fantasy heaven that would supposedly exist even if earth’s
exterior became like that of Mars. Of course people will commit
acts of violence, abuse and brutality if they believe that they will go to
their fantasy heaven by doing it. That heaven is always made out to be better
than anything here on earth. Just because people believe something does not
grant it any credibility as fact. Without evidence, most of what we are taught
is fantasy. In the final part of the
series we will examine what we have to build on if we dismiss the unsupportable
and often contradictory propositions put forward by people who base their
beliefs on faith even if it flies in the face of provable fact. Bill Allin |
|
| << April27, 2007 - Storytime Tapestry Update on Hart |
April28, 2007 - April 28, 2007 - Storytime Tapestry Contributors: Pamela Blaine; Cynthia Groopman >> |
Storytime_Tapestry Archives Index
|
Subscribe
|
|
|
Archives powered by Zinester's Mailing List Service
Details on Storytime_Tapestry |
Browse for more newsletters at Zinester's Ezine Directory
Managed by Zinester's Mailing List Management |